Topstep
CHICAGO, United States, Feb. 10, 2026 — In the fast-moving, rumor-prone world of proprietary trading, few things can unsettle traders more quickly than whispers of sudden rule changes. Over the past several weeks, Topstep, one of the most closely watched futures prop firms in the United States, found itself at the center of exactly that kind of speculation. Social media platforms, including Discord servers, Reddit forums, and X threads, buzzed with claims that the firm had quietly introduced intraday trailing drawdowns and harsher daily loss enforcement in live funded accounts.
The rumors were persistent and, for many traders, deeply unsettling. According to the chatter, Topstep was allegedly moving toward auto-liquidating trades during the session and tightening risk parameters without clear disclosure. In an industry where a single misunderstood rule can cost a trader their funded account, the uncertainty quickly became more than background noise. It prompted anxiety, second-guessing, and, in some cases, premature exits from otherwise sound trading positions.
That is why Topstep CEO Michael Patak’s direct intervention carried such weight. Rather than allowing speculation to spiral further, Patak addressed the claims head-on, delivering an unequivocal message that cut through the confusion. His statement left little room for interpretation: there is no intraday trailing drawdown in live funded accounts, and there has been no change to how daily loss limits are applied.
Rumors, Fear, and the Fragile Psychology of Traders
The proprietary trading space has grown rapidly over the past decade, attracting both seasoned professionals and ambitious retail traders seeking access to larger pools of capital. With that growth has come heightened sensitivity to rule structures, particularly around drawdowns, daily loss limits, and liquidation thresholds. According to market observers, even unverified claims can materially affect trader behavior.
As stated by several traders active in online communities, the mere suggestion of intraday drawdown enforcement was enough to trigger defensive trading. Some reduced position size drastically, others closed trades early to avoid perceived risk, and a few stepped away from the market entirely until clarity emerged. In line with behavioral finance research, uncertainty often leads traders to prioritize rule avoidance over strategy execution, eroding long-term performance.
This environment made Patak’s intervention especially timely. By speaking directly and publicly, the CEO effectively removed ambiguity at a moment when misinformation threatened to undermine confidence in Topstep’s live funded offering.
Michael Patak’s Message: No Room for Interpretation
Patak’s clarification was notable not just for its content, but for its tone. Rather than issuing a carefully hedged corporate statement, he opted for plain language that resonated with traders. His message emphasized that the daily loss limit in live funded accounts is a hard stop evaluated only at the end of the trading session.
“If you’re down on the day, it NEVER busts you out of a winning trade. Hard stop.”
According to Patak, live funded accounts are not monitored on a tick-by-tick basis for daily loss limit enforcement. Unrealized losses during the session do not trigger forced liquidations, nor do they trail account equity intraday. Instead, the firm evaluates the account’s net profit and loss at session close. Only if the trader finishes the day beyond the allowed daily loss limit does the violation occur.
This distinction, while technical, is critical. As Patak explained, traders may experience significant intraday drawdowns and still recover before the close without penalty, provided they remain within the established limits by the end of the session.
How the Daily Loss Limit Actually Works
In practical terms, Topstep’s daily loss limit functions as an end-of-day safeguard rather than an intraday constraint. Traders can find themselves temporarily negative during the session and still hold positions that later move decisively in their favor. The account’s compliance is assessed only after the market session concludes.
For example, a trader might be down $1,500 midway through the afternoon while holding a position that eventually moves into a $4,000 unrealized gain before the close. According to Topstep’s rules, that trader is not penalized simply for having been down earlier in the day. What matters is the final outcome when the session ends.
This approach contrasts sharply with other proprietary firms that enforce intraday trailing drawdowns. At those firms, touching a predefined loss threshold — even briefly — can result in immediate liquidation, regardless of whether the trade later recovers. As stated by industry analysts, such structures often force traders into overly conservative behavior and reduce their ability to let profitable trades develop.
Evaluation Accounts Versus Live Funded Accounts
One source of confusion highlighted in recent discussions is the difference between Topstep’s Trading Combine evaluation phase and its live funded accounts. According to the firm’s published rules, trailing drawdowns do apply during the evaluation stage, where the goal is to assess a trader’s consistency and risk discipline.
Once a trader transitions into a live funded account, however, the drawdown structure changes. The maximum drawdown becomes static, and daily loss limits are enforced only at the end of the trading day. This bifurcated approach is designed to balance rigorous screening with more flexible live trading conditions.
As stated by Topstep representatives in prior disclosures, the evaluation phase is intentionally stricter to ensure traders can operate within defined risk parameters. The live funded environment, by contrast, is structured to more closely resemble professional trading desks, where intraday volatility is tolerated as part of normal market behavior.
Why Rule Clarity Is Crucial in 2026
The timing of this clarification is significant. By 2026, the proprietary trading industry has become more crowded, competitive, and scrutinized. Regulatory attention has increased, and traders are more discerning about where they allocate their time and capital. In this context, transparency is no longer optional.
Unclear or shifting rules can have cascading effects. Traders may overtrade in an attempt to “lock in” gains, cut winning positions prematurely, or avoid otherwise valid setups due to fear of rule violations. Over time, these behaviors erode performance and confidence.
According to trading psychologists, certainty around risk parameters allows traders to focus on execution rather than compliance anxiety. When a firm’s leadership communicates rules clearly and consistently, it reduces cognitive load and supports disciplined decision-making.
Comparing Topstep’s Model With Industry Practices
Topstep’s end-of-day loss limit enforcement places it among a subset of prop firms that prioritize flexibility during the trading session. In contrast, many competitors rely on intraday trailing drawdowns that adjust dynamically as account equity fluctuates.
While proponents of intraday enforcement argue that it limits excessive risk-taking, critics counter that it disproportionately penalizes strategies involving normal drawdowns, such as trend-following or scale-in approaches. According to market participants, these strategies often require patience through temporary adverse moves before delivering outsized gains.
By allowing traders to manage positions without fear of mid-session liquidation, Topstep’s model arguably aligns more closely with institutional trading norms. As stated by former proprietary desk managers, professional traders are typically evaluated on daily and longer-term performance rather than moment-to-moment equity swings.
The Broader Trust Equation in Prop Trading
Trust has emerged as one of the most valuable currencies in the prop trading industry. With dozens of firms offering funded accounts, traders increasingly differentiate platforms based on transparency, consistency, and leadership credibility.
Patak’s willingness to address rumors directly reinforces Topstep’s positioning as a firm that values open communication. In an industry often criticized for opaque rulebooks and fine-print surprises, such engagement can be a meaningful differentiator.
As stated by several experienced traders, knowing that a CEO is monitoring community sentiment and responding decisively builds confidence. It signals that the firm understands the real-world implications of its rules and is invested in trader success beyond marketing claims.
Key Takeaways for Traders Evaluating Prop Firms
For traders comparing proprietary firms in 2026, the Topstep clarification offers several broader lessons. First, not all drawdown rules are created equal, even when they sound similar on paper. Understanding when and how limits are enforced can materially affect strategy viability.
Second, leadership transparency matters. Firms that communicate clearly reduce the likelihood of costly misunderstandings and foster more stable trading behavior. Finally, traders are reminded of the importance of verifying information directly from primary sources rather than relying solely on social media speculation.
According to industry educators, traders who take the time to understand rule mechanics thoroughly are better positioned to adapt their strategies and maintain consistency across varying market conditions.
In the end, Michael Patak’s intervention served as a reset. By reaffirming that there is no intraday trailing drawdown in live funded accounts and that daily loss limits are evaluated only at the end of the session, Topstep restored clarity at a moment when uncertainty threatened to overshadow performance. For traders navigating increasingly complex markets, that clarity may be just as valuable as capital itself.
About the Author
